For therapists & counselors — private practice

How many of 150 prospective clients would book a consultation from your site?

Paste your website below. A panel of 150 realistic prospective clients — first-time seekers, fit-focused switchers, cost-and-insurance evaluators — reads your page and reacts in plain words. You see who would book a consultation, who wouldn't, and exactly what's stopping them.

Report in ~5 minutes · $29 one-time · auto-refund if we can't produce it

Synthetic panel · live0 / 150 responded

How likely are you to subscribe to this?

0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1
def. not
2
3
unsure
4
5
def. yes

The free tier sounds generous, but I can't tell what the paid plan actually adds. I'd try it and probably never upgrade.

Persona 042 · budget-conscious freelancer, 31 · rated 3

mean PI 3.62 · σ 1.0468th percentile vs. consumer-app benchmark
235+
therapy & counseling sites already scored — your result is ranked against all of them
~5 min
from pasting your URL to a full report
$29
vs $15,000+ for a traditional research panel
90%
of a live human panel's reliability, achieved by the peer-reviewed method behind the score¹

What you get

Three things, in plain language.

1

A straight number

How many of the 150 would book a consultation — and your percentile against other therapy sites. “Better than 58% of comparable pages”, not vague advice.

2

Every hesitation, in their words

The real reasons prospective clients don't reach out: unclear fit, no sense of cost or insurance, nothing that feels safe to take the first step. Quoted, counted, and grouped by client type.

3

Exactly what to change

Specific rewrites tied to each hesitation — what to say above the fold, what to reassure, what to make easier. A to-do list for your page, not theory.

Who judges your page

The jury: six kinds of prospective client

Every therapy site faces the same fixed panel, in the same proportions. That's what makes the percentile fair: your page and 235+ others, judged by the same jury.

First-time therapy seeker~33 of 150

Never done therapy and is nervous about starting. Needs warmth, a plain-language what-to-expect, and a low-friction first step; clinical jargon or a bare contact form scares them off.

Fit-focused switcher~27 of 150

Has done therapy before and is choosing carefully this time. Evaluates modality, specialization, and the therapist's voice on the page — chemistry and approach over generic reassurance.

Cost & insurance evaluator~27 of 150

Weighs private-pay fees against insurance options and their budget. Needs session fees, sliding-scale or superbill information stated plainly before they will book anything.

Skeptical pragmatist~24 of 150

Not convinced therapy works for someone like them. Needs a concrete method, what sessions actually involve, and outcome framing — vague healing language pushes them away.

Urgent relief seeker~21 of 150

In acute distress and deciding today. Scans for availability, response time, and an immediately bookable first session; any friction or ambiguity and they move to the next result.

Deciding for a partner or family~18 of 150

Booking couples, teen, or family therapy partly on someone else's behalf. Needs reassurance for a reluctant participant, logistics clarity, and confidence the therapist handles their situation.

Straight answers

What this is for — and what it isn't.

Built for

  • Seeing which client types your page reassures and which it loses — and why, in their own words
  • Ranking your page against other therapy sites judged by the same panel
  • Finding the hesitations that stop bookings: unclear fit, no cost/insurance info, no clear first step
  • Getting concrete page changes tied to each hesitation

Not built for

  • Predicting your exact booking rate — the score is directional, built for comparison
  • Replacing real client relationships — it gets prospective clients to reach out with a clearer page
  • Judging your clinical work — the panel reads your page the way a prospective client does

Pricing

One page, one payment. No subscription.

Questions

Asked by therapists & counselors who should be skeptical.

Are the 150 prospective clients real people?

No — and we're upfront about that. They're research-grade AI personas built on a peer-reviewed method (Semantic Similarity Rating) validated against 9,300 real survey respondents, recovering about 90% of what a repeated human panel finds. A rigorous rehearsal audience, not a replacement for real clients.

Does the panel understand how people choose a therapist?

Yes. The panel is built around how prospective clients actually decide — needing to feel a fit, worrying about cost and insurance, hesitating on the first step, urgency of relief — across common reasons people seek therapy. You can add a note about your specialty and the report reflects it.

My site is on a practice-management platform (SimplePractice, Squarespace…) — does that matter?

No. If your page is public, we can test it. Paste the URL exactly as a prospective client would see it.

What if you can't produce my report?

Then you aren't charged: if the page can't be read or the report can't be generated, the payment is automatically refunded.

Five minutes from now

You could know exactly why prospects don't book.

Or keep rewriting the page on instinct and hoping the next version converts.

Report in ~5 minutes · $29 one-time · auto-refund if we can't produce it